Politically Germany is one of the driving forces of European unification. But all good intentions seem to vanish if money is involved. In this respect Germany’s finance minister is no different from others. He is responsible for drafting tax laws with doubtful EU-comparability.
A good indication that German tax law is not in line with EU law is the sheer number of cases in front of the European Court of Justice. No other European country produces more cases in regard to direct taxes. In the last ten to fifteen years Germany lost a lot of cases. And it looks as though many more are to follow. A German professional magazine publishes every year a list of tax provisions which might not be in line with EU law. This year’s list names 146 different provisions! And this list does not contain potential cases on indirect taxes such as Value Added Tax (VAT) or excise taxes on energy, tobacco or alcohol.
German tax law discriminates in certain cases against foreign enterprises as well as individuals. Anti-discrimination provisions of the EU-treaty are
- General freedom right/Right to choose residence
- Freedom for employees
- Freedom of trade
- Freedom to conduct services
- Right of establishment
- Freedom to transfer capital funds
For business activities e.g. the following German regulations can be subject to court cases:
- Deduction of foreign losses
- German thin capitalisation-regulations
- Capital gains taxation if assets are transferred abroad
- Taxation at source of dividends and profit distributions
- German CFC-regulations
- German restructuring regulations
The following German taxation of individuals may breech EU freedom rights:
- Deduction of foreign losses
- Deduction of personal allowances
- Taxation of foreign investment funds
- Extensive double taxation concerning inheritances and gifts
Enterprises and individuals from other EU-countries have good chances to argue against discriminating tax regulations. For enterprises and individuals resident in non-EU countries such as the USA or Switzerland, it is much more difficult to achieve protection of EU anti-discrimination jurisdiction. But it is not impossible. This is due to the fact that the Freedom to transfer capital funds provides cover to respective world-wide activities. Companies and individuals from non-EU countries who are subject to German taxation and feel discriminated by German tax legislation should always check whether appeals against tax assessments could prove to be successful.
But to be fair it has to be said that in recent years a lot of German tax provisions have been brought in line with EU law by the German government. But in many cases it was only after Germany lost cases in front of the European Court of Justice or German fiscal courts.
Glossary
| Finance minister |
Finanzminister |
| European Court of Justice |
Europäischer Gerichtshof (EuGH) |
| Value Added Tax (VAT) |
Umsatzsteuer (USt) |
| Excise taxes |
Verbrauchsteuern |
| Thin capitalisation-regulations |
Zinsschranke |
| Controlled foreign corporation (CFC)-regulations |
Hinzurechnungsbesteuerung |
| Restructuring regulations |
Umwandlungssteuerrecht |
| General freedom right/Right to choose residence |
Allgemeines Freiheitsrecht/Recht auf freie Wohnsitzwahl |
| Freedom for employees |
Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit |
| Freedom of trade |
Warenverkehrsfreiheit |
| Freedom to conduct services |
Dienstleistungsfreiheit |
| Right of establishment |
Niederlassungsfreiheit |
| Freedom to transfer capital funds |
Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit |
| Inheritance and gift tax |
Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer |
Author: Peter Scheller, Somann & Scheller, www.somannscheller.de
By Peter Scheller on 05.02.2010 at 19:38 •
Categories: European Union Germany • Tags: Allgemeines Freiheitsrecht, Arbeitsnehmerfreizügigkeit, CFC-rules, Controlled foreign coorporation (CFC)-regulations, Dienstleistungsfreiheit, Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer, Europäischer Gerichtshof (EuGH), European Court of Justice, European Union, Excise taxes, Finance minister, Finanzminister, Freedom for employees, Freedom of trade, Freedom to conduct services, Freedom to transfer capital funds, General freedom right, Germany, Hinzurechnungsbesteuerung, Inheritance and gift tax, Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit, Niederlassungsfreiheit, Recht auf freie Wohnsitzwahl, Restructuring regulations, Right of establishment, Right to choose residence, Switzerland, Thin capitalisation-regulations, Umsatzsteuer (USt), Umwandlungssteuerrecht, USA, Value Added Tax (VAT), Value Added Tax/Sales Tax, Verbrauchsteuern, Warenverkehrsfreiheit, Zinsschranke
Traditionally Germany’s economy is based on small and medium-sized enterprises. These companies employ over 60% of the German work force. And these companies have a fair share in Germany’s position as second biggest exporting country in the world. Enterprises of other countries who want to establish business relations with German enterprises should not only concentrate on the big multinational enterprises. In certain industry sectors medium-sized companies can be the better choice to find a suitable business partner.
Large German companies have the legal form of an Aktiengesellschaft (AG), the German equivalent to an Incorporation in the Anglo-American legal systems. Small and medium sized businesses often choose the form of a Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), equivalent to a Limited liability company. Both legal forms are corporations with own legal identity.
But a lot of small and medium sized enterprises in Germany are legally organised in the form of a trading partnership (Personenhandelsgesellschaft). This very often confuses business partners especially from Anglo-Saxon countries since there partnerships are seldom used for business purposes. The translation of the term Personenhandelsgesellschaft is a little bit misleading. A better translation would be not-incorporated trading company with partners as shareholders.
The basic forms of partnerships are the offene Handelsgesellschaft (oHG) and the Kommanditgesellschaft (KG). These legal forms require the unlimited liability of all partners (oHG) or of at least one partner (KG). Because of the unlimited liability of partners these legal forms are seldom used.
But often used is a GmbH & Co. KG. This is a combination of a GmbH and a KG. The KG is the operating unit. The GmbH’s only purpose is to be unlimited liable partner of the KG. Shareholders of GmbH and KG are in general the same persons.

With this legal structure owners or investors can avoid unlimited liability but also use the less strict legal framework of partnerships.
The tax regime for corporations and partnerships is different.
Corporations (GmbH and AG) are subject to corporation income tax (Körperschaftsteuer / tax rate: 15%) and solidarity surplus charge (Solidaritätszuschlag / tax rate: 5.5% of corporation tax) and the municipal business tax. The combined tax rate on profits is between 28% and 32%. Dividends derived by individuals are taxed in general at a rate of 25% plus solidarity surplus charge. 95% of dividends to corporations are tax exempt. The latter applies also for foreign corporations.
Partnerships (oHG or KG) are treated for tax purposes as transparent entities. Consequently profits of partnerships are taxed as business income by individuals. Individual income is imposed at progressive income tax rates. Maximum income tax rate is 45% plus solidarity surplus charge. If partners are corporations their profit shares are taxed as regular income. The partnership itself is subject to business tax.
Business tax (Gewerbesteuer) is imposed by the municipalities. The taxable income for business tax is generally determined by the taxable income with certain adjustments. Municipalities can fix tax rates individually. This results in higher tax burdens in the big German cities and lower rates in surrounding areas. Sometime it might be suitable to situate own business activities outside of the big cities. The business tax rates vary from 13% to 17%.
Germany does not allow free choice of the tax regime for corporations and partnerships such as the US check-the-box-treatment.
Glossary
| Corporation |
Körperschaftsteuer |
| Trading partnership |
Personenhandelsgesellschaft |
| Incorporation |
Aktiengesellschaft (AG) |
| Limited liability company |
Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH) |
| Unlimited partnership |
offene Handelsgesellschaft (oHG) |
| (Partly) limited partnership |
Kommanditgesellschaft (KG) |
| Limited partnership |
GmbH & Co. KG |
| Individual income tax |
Einkommensteuer |
| Corporation income tax |
Körperschaftsteuer |
| Solidarity surplus charge |
Solidaritätszuschlag |
| Business tax |
Gewerbesteuer |
Author: Peter Scheller, Somann & Scheller, www.somannscheller.de
By Peter Scheller on 05.02.2010 at 19:19 •
Categories: Company Law Germany • Tags: Aktiengesellschaft (AG), Business tax, Check-the-Box, Corporation, Corporation income tax, Einkommensteuer, Germany, Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), Gewerbesteuer, GmbH & Co. KG, Incorporation, Individual income tax, Kommanditgesellschaft (KG), Körperschaftsteuer, Limited liability company, Limited partnership, offene Handelsgesellschaft (oHG), Personenhandelsgesellschaft, Solidaritätszuschlag, Solidarity surplus charge, Trading partnership, UK, Unlimited partnership, USA